India
Politics

Supreme Court Issues Notice to Rahul Gandhi Over Alleged Manhandling of Pregnant Journalist

The Supreme Court has sought a response from Congress leader Rahul Gandhi following a petition alleging a pregnant journalist was pushed during a media scrum.

Gaurav Sen
By Gaurav Sen
Senior Editorial Director & Lead Geopolitical Analyst
•2 min read•4 views
Share:
Exterior view of the Supreme Court of India with advocates and journalists on the premises
The Supreme Court of India has sought a formal response from Congress leader Rahul Gandhi in connection with the plea.
The Supreme Court of India has issued formal notice to Leader of the Opposition and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi, seeking his response to a plea concerning the alleged manhandling and pushing of a pregnant journalist during a crowded media interaction.

A bench comprising senior justices agreed to examine the petition after counsel representing the aggrieved media professional argued that proper safety and security protocols were breached, leading to an unwarranted physical altercation in which the journalist sustained distress.

Background of the Petition

The matter stems from an incident that unfolded during an intense political press gathering where media personnel had assembled to question the senior leader. According to the petition, the journalist, who was visibly pregnant at the time, was pushed aside amidst the chaos of the security perimeter and party entourage.

The petitioner approached the top court seeking directives for an independent inquiry into the incident, as well as guidelines to safeguard working journalists, particularly female professionals, during high-density political scrums and public rallies.

Arguments Presented in Court

During the preliminary hearing, the petitioner's legal counsel underscored the escalating risks faced by reporters on field duty:

* Safety Protocols: The plea argued that political leaders and their private security apparatus must maintain minimum standards of decorum and physical safety when interacting with the press. * Accountability: The petition contends that the incident was not merely an accidental crush of crowds but involved excessive physical intervention that put the journalist and her unborn child at severe risk. * Institutional Protection: Calls were made for formal guidelines to prevent similar episodes during chaotic political press scrums across the country.

The bench observed the seriousness of the allegations and directed that notices be served to the relevant parties, including Gandhi, returnable within four weeks.

Broader Implications for Press Safety

The proceedings have reignited conversations within the media fraternity regarding working conditions for field reporters in India. Crowded briefings and high-intensity political rallies frequently expose journalists, camera operators, and broadcast crews to volatile crowd surges and aggressive perimeter security.

The apex court is expected to take up the matter for further directions once the formal responses from all named respondents are submitted to the registry.

Gaurav Sen

About Gaurav Sen

Senior Editorial Director & Lead Geopolitical Analyst

Senior Editorial Director and investigative correspondent covering national affairs, international relations, defense, and economic policy for Live News 365.

@gauravsen_newsgaurav.sen@livenews365.com